Monday, April 17, 2006

Royal visitors

Last weekend I had some important visitors, here's some exclusive photo footage of their stay in London.


Tubewise


Yes, this is London indeed!


This is PJ reporting live from Clement House, LSE, London. Back to the studio


Peejay's taking a piss out of the pinguin, the LSE's new student mascotte


HARROD'S, South Kensington, London; the supermarket for the ridiculously wealthy and extremely ignorant about the cost of living. As if London's not expensive enough yet...
Of course I couldn't resist trying a £2 salmon cake; it wasn't even that good, bah, money doesn't make life better...


"Burberry, for a less-exclusive high society life"
(within seconds the staff at Harrod's came round to prevent us from taking further pictures, but we have enough material for our counterfeiting production in Malaysia)


Besides for Burberry Peejay also has a mysterious fascination for the number 63, or better for its improbable pronunciation in Dutch as the juicy "drieënsjestig"


Mum and dad at Starbucks, nowadays as much a daily life thing London town as queues, red telephone cabins, black cabs, etc.




As you can see I'm still not relinquishing to the crazy bus drivers of London











Two generations of Brouwers's in a small student room






My mums fascination for cats and jewels surfaces again in the British Museum










Thou shall pose and smile on the photo!



If you didn't know it yet: Yes, PJ is good for you


Da bros


Tate Modern fascination


Millenium bridge, St. Paul's and a photo stalker in the background

1 Comments:

Blogger The Dog of Freetown said...

LSEs mascot, as bad as it may be, is a lot better than King's mascot. Which is where I am right this instant, as it happens. King's has a huge red lion filled with concrete which looks like it was made by a child. A child with no artistic talent. It is filled with concrete in order to stop LSE students from stealing it, as has been their habit in the past. Personally I wouldn't want to steal it. However, if you had seen it in the Tate modern I reckon it would have been rated a masterpiece.

Tuesday, April 18, 2006 2:31:00 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home